Today I finish up tantalizing all of you with photos of stunning clothing. And today’s view holds some absolutely stellar clothing.
Above is a suit from Yves Saint Laurent, from the spring 1963 haute couture. It seemed to be a real crowd favorite, and I can see why.
The lace is just exquisite! It was also made by machine.
The dress on the left is from Simone Rocha, from her spring 2014 ready-to-wear collection. She called this the “Wet Lace Frill Dress”. It’s not really wet; the illusion is achieved by use of a foil polyurethane layer laminated to back of the lace of the bodice, which is nylon. It was not particularity appealing.
At first glance one might have “1920s” fit through the head when looking at the dress on the right, but it is actually a 1963 cocktail dress from Balenciaga. The lace is machine made, but the dress is constructed by hand.
Here’s where I got to show off a bit of knowledge to my friend, Jill. This silk lace gown is by Chanel, and is from 1938. You can see the precise placement of the medallion motifs, but what you can’t see in my photo is how the lace was trimmed and overlapped to match, instead of being constructed with straight seams.
And while Coco Chanel’s use of flowers is exuberant, next to Karl Lagerfeld’s floral concoctions the decoration on this dress looks understated.
This is the place in the exhibition where I was to the point that I’d been exposed to all the hard plastic and 3D garments I could take. By looking though my photos you are not going to see an accurate representation of this part of the exhibition. The Hussein Chalayan and Iris van Herpen and threeARFOUR hard dresses simply ceased to be of interest to me. Maybe due to my viewing of the Iris van Herpen show at the High Museum in Atlanta, I had seen these concepts recently and they were fresh on my mind.
Call me old fashioned, but beautiful as those clothes are, I’ve got to question if they are, in fact, fashion.
This 1920s dress has an interesting history. It came to the Met as part of the Brooklyn Museum collection, and had been donated to the Brooklyn by Mercedes de Acosta. The dress and many more garments containing lace had belonged to her sister, Rita de Acosta Lydig. Lydig was a collector of antique laces, which she had incorporated into her new clothing, much of which was made by Callot Soeurs. While there is no label, it is thought this dress of handmade lace and black silk was made by Callot Soeurs.
Made around 1870, I’m pretty sure this is the oldest garment in the exhibition. It is all hand Irish crochet lace. It looked a bit forlorn and out of place.
Update: I’ve been told that this dress is miscatalogued, and is actually from the early 20th century. This is certainly out of my range of knowledge.
This coat by Paul Poiret was the biggest surprise (to me, anyway) of the show. None of the many reviews I had read pictured this, one of my all-time favorite garments. It was in the 1996 Haute Couture show, and in the 2007 Poiret exhibition, so maybe the reviewers had already seen it and did not find it to be of great interest. If so, I beg to differ!
The white decoration is leather, cut and applied by hand. You can even see the stitch marks. The back is also decorated, but unfortunately the method of display did not give a good look at the back.
By contrast, the newer, machine and even laser cut leather decorated garments just did not measure up to the work of this coat. I was a bit embarrassed for them!
2013 haute couture from Dolce and Gabbana. The decoration is green laser cut lambs fleece.
Here’s another 1960s look from Paco Rabanne, this one much more wearable that the metal dress I posted earlier. It is made from diamond shaped pieces of leather and astrakhan fur, linked together with pieces of metal.
Synthetic leather was also shown. This 2013 dress from Comme des Garcon, is made of handmade faux leather flowers, hand linked, over a machine sewn base.
The Tailleur and the Flou
And as if there was not already enough to digest, the visitor to Manus X Machina is treated to an appendix in the form of showing the two types of haute couture ateliers: the tailleur (tailoring) and the flou (dressmaking).
As a sort of centerpiece of this section, the curators placed a working toile from Charles James (left) next to several more recent works that appear to be toiles, but are, in fact, finished garments.
These two dresses are from Andre Courreges, and I’m sure you recognize them as being from the 1960s. We sometimes look at clothing from the 60s as being “simple” but a lot of skill goes into the making of dresses like these.
A perfectly executed seam.
Please forgive this incredibly awful photo, but I have to show it to make the next point. The dress above is by Coco Chanel, made in 1927 of wool jersey and silk satin. It is an excellent example of the type of thing made in the flou atelier.
The tailleur is represented with a lineup of Chanel suits, with the one on the left dating from 1963, and the one on the right being from 2015.
While the suits on the left and the center are pretty much what you would expect from Chanel, a close-up of the jacket on the right is a whole new thing. What you are looking at is not fabric at all, but is a 3D printed mesh. It appears to me that it is laid over a layer of fabric.
The suit looks to be perfectly wearable, but I’ve got some doubts about that. But it is at least a use of 3D printing that people can relate to, which seems to me to be important if the technology is to be accepted as a viable alternative to conventional fabric.
And with that, I’ll finish up this tour of Manus X Machina. It’s on view through September 5, 2016, and if possible, you need to put this at the top of your summer plans. I’d love to hear from others who have already seen the show.